Size of data storage limits the speed of data transfer
How is this not an issue in the world of natural language processing and cognitive networks (?)
This led me to think on the following lines (...)
Is data under relative data transfer always relational data? There may not be something such as static data or static information at all (!) The moment something is stored, it becomes stale, stealth, stagnant with respect to the flux of information. Information flux : How can this exist ? Will this be a tensor, vector or even a scalar or something else for that matter (...) Is information directional in space time curvature (??)
We know that information is historical; some encrypted message may become more informative with the progress or transition of time. And same information, public or decrypted for a long time, can become encrypted after a particular conjecture. Thus a question arises: Is cryptography a temporal operator or spacial operator, or a relational operator (??)
Can we crypt a message unique to a space or time(??); it seems yes it is possible. When we add a cipher, data redundancy etc., we are doing a spacial cryptographic operation. And when the same operation carried over transmission ( obviously, any change in the data size will reflect in the rate of data transmission ).
Thus coming to the heart of quantization, miniaturization is only one of the approaches that we know.
There should be a relativistic approach towards quantization, and vice versa, i.e, quantum mechanical roadmap to achieve relativistic realms should be feasible.